Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jay's avatar

An alternative: what people really want is the bad thing packaged with plausible deniability. The stop dressing for male gaze was not aimed at feminist eyeballs at all. It was all hot outfits, all the way down: the consumers just wanted to be able to tell a story it was about something else.

It's like how news channels will try to run tape of attractive people in little clothing if it can possibly get away with it.

I think your dating for people on the spectrum post sort of gets at this idea: the bit about how looking unattainable gives more license to women to dress sexier. I think the plausible deniability might be a sort of epistemic hygiene thing that people value. Or you know some illicit, forbidden appeal. I can totally see that as being hot in a rape fantasy style.

I knew a girl who did a bunch of Instagram stuff while she was a model. Her raciest post by far was ostensibly a story about how a photographer propositioned her metoo style and she said no but was uncomfortable. But it was (especially in the context of knowing her irl) very clearly just an excuse to post the lingerie.

Expand full comment
Alexandre Papin's avatar

side A 🤝 side B

legitimizing

the A/B

dialectic

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts